The illustration above does not represent Confederation. There’s nothing wrong with it, but the societal system in the illustration does not have a Constitution in British North America. If anyone wants to try that system, they will have to try it elsewhere, since the territory of Canada is taken and fully occupied from sea to shining sea.
Self-determination
Self-determination is recognized by international law as a fundamental human right without which no coherent people can hope to exist. So true is this that in 1962, Pierre Trudeau was able to predict that the French Canadians “must one day disappear”1 within his new “polyethnic pluralist” society, which he planned to impose at the first opportunity. Trudeau celebrated the planned genocide of the French Canadians, and the reduction to minority status of Britanno Canadians.2
So true is the necessity of self-determination to the coherent existence of a people that lawyers3 for the interests of Palestine at the International Court of Justice in early 2024 stated that the invasion by Israeli settler communities of the illegally occupied Palestinian territories creates a “fragmented archipelago” preventing the self-determination of the Palestinian people in their own homeland. The ICJ, they said, has ordered Israel to remove the illegal settlers to restore Palestine’s right of self-determination within its territory.
But a parallel exists in Canada where the immigration power has long been abused as a coup de force to erase rather than perpetuate Confederation. The British North Americans, the real Canadians, “BNA Canadians” for short, are constitutionally guaranteed the right to be and remain the self-determining ethnic majority in each province with a coherent territory exclusively reserved for the perpetual use of that group. That is why the provinces were created, otherwise, today, there would be a central Parliament and nothing more. There would be a “legislative union” of all ethnic groups, an option rejected by the founders in the Debates of 1865.
The purpose of provincial boundaries therefore is to confine local laws to territory within local borders, to prevent one province from interfering with the self-determination of any other province belonging to a different BNA ethnic majority. As Frank Scott said, in a lecture at McGill:4
After Union, the Canadian provinces lost much of their autonomy, and became part of a larger whole called Canada. But they did not lose their identity. They, too, are governments, with a large and important sphere of jurisdiction reserved to them.
Frank Scott’s clear affirmation underscores the material historical fact that a main purpose of the BNA Act of 1867 was the self-government of the founding ethnic majorities, each with its own Province and Legislature.
As Attorney General John A. Macdonald observed in the Legislative Assembly of Monday, February 6, 1865 (p. 29 of the Debates):
… [I]t was found that any proposition which involved the absorption of the individuality of Lower Canada — if I may use the expression — would not be received with favor by her people. We found too, that though their people speak the same language and enjoy the same system of law as the people of Upper Canada, a system founded on the common law of England, there was as great a disinclination on the part of the various Maritime Provinces to lose their individuality as separate political organisations, as we observed in the case of Lower Canada herself. (Hear, hear.)
Confederation was built upon four founding colonies, all of whom wished to retain their unique characters. Canada, then, in a true sense, backed by constitutional law, by the structure and language of the BNA Act, is an ethnic federation of her own Founding Peoples for their own preservation.
Each founding people obtained its own provincial Legislature, with full local powers to preserve and develop its own local culture, permanently. In this way, ceasing forever to be a mere “minority” among all others; but each one a majority on its own soil, under its own local government. In the Division of Powers (Sections 91 & 92 et seq. of the BNA 1867), Education is an exclusive power of the provinces, precisely to ensure permanent control over local cultural identity.5
Then, here come the foreigners. Landing in Canada en masse at an alarming and increasing rate, they have settled on our BNA territories, transforming them into “fragmented archipelagos” where BNA Canadians no longer enjoy the territorial coherence required for self-determination and are therefore losing their identities.
Worse than in the Palestinian case, foreigners have invaded the political institutions of the BNA Canadians, who no longer have institutions of their own. The only shared institution in this country is the central Parliament, which also belongs to the BNA Canadians and not to foreigners. Provincial Legislatures are not to be shared. The institutions of the BNA Canadians have been hijacked and transformed into something not authorized and certainly forbidden by the Constitution of 1867.
When BNA Canadians express their dismay at this situation, they are labeled with derogatory terms that describe their constitutional right to self-determination as “systemically racist,” or “xenophobic,” and, better yet, “white supremacist,” the new “N” word, but for white people. This is another example of the coup de force the intimidation used to silence the BNA Canadians while their land and rights are stolen. The force exerted intensifies when BNA Canadians are threatened or charged with so-called “hate crimes” to silence their opposition to the usurpation of their lands and rights.
In reality, it is these foreigners who are the actual self-serving racists, attacking BNA Canadians with scandalous labels while demanding that the real Canadians “cooperate” and “participate” (translation: “give in”) to domination by imported foreigners.
The Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples Adopted by UN General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 declares that:
1. The subjection of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation.
2. All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”
Those are lovely words, used to “liberate” mostly brown people from colonial domination. Today, these words apply to the BNA Canadians who have been recolonized by foreign mass migration, mostly by brown people, depriving real Canadians of their right to self-determination. Furthermore, the BNA Canadians freely determined their political status in 1867 and at subsequent dates of accession by adopting a permanent constitution for self-preservation. “Newcomers” now demand that real Canadians accept being shoved aside, told how to behave and dominated by foreigners on their own soil.
This is a form of alien subjugation that the right to self-determination aims to prevent.
These mass imported foreigners are invaders on BNA territory, just like Israeli settlers on Palestinian territory. Yet, at the ICJ, international lawyers don their gowns to defend these same rights of Palestinians, while the corrupt communist regime in Canada continues to punish BNA Canadians who oppose their own dispossession, and policies that enforce their disappearance. These are genocidal policies designed to steal Canadian territory for recolonization, to repurpose it for the use of others.
While loud screams circle the planet declaring “white” people to be “settler colonialists”, the reality is that plenty of brown people and other foreigners are actually resettling, recolonizing, dominating and oppressing “white” countries.
The abuse of power in immigration matters has transformed our BNA legislatures, both federal and provincial, into multi-ethnic merry-go-rounds where Canada’s founding peoples no longer have self-determination. Instead, they are forced to compete, “cooperate,” or “participate” with hordes of culturally distinct foreigners imported en masse, in the drafting of laws to govern the territory of the Dominion of Canada. This is illegal, unconstitutional, and can be corrected by reinstating the British North America Act of 1867.
Canada in recent decades has been called “a rainbow country”, so extreme is the mass “immigration” (population transfer). Yet the term Confederation continues to be used, as if it applied to this “rainbow country”. It does not.
Canada is not a “rainbow nation.” Canada is legally, that is, constitutionally, the homeland of a small group of cultures that were established by the founding peoples over hundreds of years of pioneering, and which formed a permanent union in 1867 enlarged on subsequent dates of accession.
How did we get here? The story dates back to the beginning of the last century, but the situation deteriorated sharply in 1965 when Soviet agent Lester Bowles Pearson tasked the Canadian Jewish Congress with forming its own “royal commission” to recommend criminal provisions for ‘hate’ charges against anyone opposing the massive presence of “identifiable” groups not then extant in Canada.
Criminal provisions were then imposed on BNA Canadians by left-wing traitors who sought to criminalize the constitutional self-determination of the founding peoples, as if the Confederation itself could be criminalized. BNA Canadians have been prosecuted, criminalized, imprisoned, and maliciously slandered to clearly discourage others from speaking out, lest they suffer the same fate.
Of course, all of this was just a sham, like Mulroney’s fake “Multiculturalism Act” of 1988, because “multiculturalism” is a constitution, not a policy or a “doctrine”, as some like to claim. It is a new and different constitution, “inconsistent” and “incompatible” with the 1867 Constitution and therefore it is null and void because it is illegal. The left, led by the Canadian Jewish Congress, sought to criminalize Confederation to take over and recolonize Canadian territory, and to this day, this negative force in our homeland has gotten away with its genocidal deception.
FOOTNOTES
1. “Other than to situate us in the correct perspective, it will get us nowhere to affirm that the French-Canadian nation must probably disappear one day, and that the Canadian State itself will not last forever. Benda underscores that it is one of the grandeurs of Thucydides that he had been able to envision a world in which Athens was no more.” The New Treason of the Clerics: Pierre Elliott Trudeau. From an English translation prepared from a scan of the original article in the April 1962 issue of Cité Libre magazine.
2. “At the same time, and in a movement of retreat, English-Canadian nationalism must consent to change the image that it has made of Canada: if it wants to protect and incarnate these specific ethnic values, it must do so by means of carving out local and regional autonomies rather than by way of pan-Canadian sovereignty.” Ibid., supra.
3. The lawyers are barristers Amy Sander and Naomi Hart, international lawyers of Essex Court Chambers and members of the Bar of England and Wales. See transcript, “Public sitting held on Monday 26 February 2024, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Salam presiding, on the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem (Request Document Number 186-20240226-ORA-02-00-BI, Document Type, verbatim_record”.
4. “Professor F R Scott of McGill University Explains the BNA Act of 1867“. (part of a lecture).
5. The federal government may not trespass into the realm of Education. However, this has happened with the federal CBC that has misappropriated the provincial Education power to create left-wing video-histories of Canada that undermine the local identities of Canadians, and the nation of Canada as a whole. Notably, the CBC has illegally used the local Education power to mobilize the teaching profession at all levels to brainwash young Canadians into believing that Canada is doomed to fall apart. Scroll to the bottom of that page, and you’ll find links to “Teacher resources”. This is totally illegal and generations of young Canadians have been damaged by subversive propaganda, designed to elicit their submission to the ultimate destruction of Confederation, to be replaced by a new global system.
5. Barrister Amy Sander on the “fragmented archipelago” impeding self-determination. Segment transcribed by Turboscribe. “(0:00) The second stream of significance is to the questions before the court. (0:06) The issue of water resources flows through four key aspects of the unlawfulness of Israeli policies (0:14) and practices on which the oral submissions have focused, and I address each aspect in turn. (0:23) The first key aspect, the violation of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.
(0:30) The following points are crystal clear. First, the Palestinians are a distinct people with a (0:36) right to self-determination, an inalienable norm of Jus cogens. Second, Israel’s conduct (0:43) has violated different components of that right, notably the right to territorial integrity, (0:50) the right not to be subjected to demographic manipulation within that territory by a foreign (0:56) power [in the Canadian case, our de facto regimes are a foreign power], the right of the people to pursue its chosen economic, social, and cultural development, (1:03) and its right to exercise permanent sovereignty over its natural resources. [And yet, in Canada, foreigners who are not BNA Canadians, are devouring our resources.]
(1:08) And the critical importance of this well-established latter component, (1:14) the Palestinian people’s right to exercise permanent sovereignty over their natural (1:20) resources, was recently stressed by the General Assembly in its resolution of December 2023. (1:29) Such resources clearly include water. Israel’s policies and practices with respect to water (1:36) resources, the deprivation, denial on a discriminatory basis, and destruction, (1:43) thus constitute one acutely serious and ongoing facet of the breach of the Palestinian people’s (1:51) right to self-determination, described by our UN body as one of the most fundamental (1:57) conditions for survival.
For a people, sufficient clean water is indispensable. (2:05) Turning to the second key aspect, the policies and practices of Israel in the occupied Palestinian (2:12) territory violate the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force. This afternoon we have heard (2:21) some attempts to muddy the waters in this regard, so I will recall the points of crystal clarity.
(2:29) First, a corollary of the Yuskogin’s prohibition of use of force is the prohibition of any (2:37) acquisition of territory by threat or use of force. Irrespective of international recognition (2:45) of Palestine’s borders, the applicability of this prohibition to the occupied Palestinian (2:52) territory cannot be in doubt, as expressly recognized in resolutions of both the General (2:59) Assembly and Security Council. Second, international law requires that occupation be temporary.
(3:08) Third, any purported exercise of the use of self-defense must be necessary and proportionate. (3:17) Fourth, and flowing from the three previous points, an occupying power cannot acquire sovereignty over (3:26) an occupied territory, including by annexation, irrespective of whether it claims to have acted (3:33) in self-defense at any point during the occupation. Yet Israel has annexed all of the occupied (3:41) Palestinian territory, whether through Israeli law or conduct manifesting a de facto annexation, (3:49) creating a fait accompli.
And there’s no shortage of evidence on this reality, (3:57) as emphasized by many UN bodies and demonstrated by the map recently shown by the Prime Minister (4:04) of Israel before the General Assembly, referred to on the first day of this hearing. (4:11) Israel’s deprivation, denial on a discriminatory basis, and destruction with respect to water (4:17) resources is one facet of this annexation. The scale and nature of Israel’s conduct in this (4:25) regard makes clear that it forms an integral element of Israel’s establishment of control (4:32) through coercive measures, reflecting its intention to appropriate that territory permanently.
The (4:40) occupation having, to quote the special rapporteur, burst through the restraints of temporariness (4:47) long ago. Israel’s settlement expansion is plainly another integral element of that annexation, (4:55) with Palestinians reduced to inhabiting a fragmented archipelago of disparate patches of land.”
